Are Mozart's works copyrighted?
for that matter anybody from thousands of years ago that published any material, the copyright law states that works are protected from the time of death of the person to 75 years from then, thats the US system. who would sue me if i coppied mozart's music?
Answers:
Any item published before 1923 has entered the public domain according to US copyright law & copyright laws are standardized through international conventions such as the Berne Convention in some countries and are required by international organizations such as European Union or World Trade Organization from their member states.
So that means any work by Mozart, Shakespeare, etc are public domain.
no one, its in the public domain now, well i guess you might have to site public domain, but i'm not sure
probably mozart's great great great great grand kids....and with shakespear, his stuff isn't copyrighted 'cause back then there wasn't copyright, but people would still recognize shakespear's stuff if you stole it..it's the same with music, i'm pretty sure someone would notice and you'd get sued.
and either way it goes, plagerism is illegal...so even if someone doesn't sue you, you can still go to jail for plagerising someone else's stuff (and i don't know how to spell plagerising cuz i'm soooooo sleepy...but you know what i mean)
one would have to ask permission from the estate of anyone
to use it's likeness to benefit themselves, or risk the consequences of being sued by the estate, whether said
material is copyrighted or not. to do so is an infringement upon
the estate and is internationally recognized.
OK, so here's the tricky part. Mozart's music is no longer copyright, but a particular arrangement of his work can be copyrighted. So you can freely make copies of Mozart's manuscripts, but you can't freely make copies of a copy of his work that was published by someone else.
Mozart's works were created over 200 hundred years ago, they are in the public domain and may be copied and performed at will. However, if someone has made their own copy, you may not copy their copy if its distinguishable from Mozart's original. So for example, the London philharmonic records their performance of Mozart's Requiem and make a CD, if you copy that CD and its identifiable as the London Philharmonic's performance then the London philharmonic may sue you but not Mozart's estate. Mozart estate has absolutley no interest in his public domain works.
No, copyright in the original music (if there were any) lapsed long ago.
However, sound recordings of PERFORMANCES of old works (made after, say, 2/15/1972) may have U.S. copyright, which is owned by the performers and producers. Any sound records made prior to that have no U.S. federal copyright at all (with certain types of foreign works excepted by treaty).
"In 1971 Congress amended the copyright code to provide copyright protection for sound recordings fixed and first published with the statutory copyright notice on or after February 15, 1972."
Also, plagiarism is not typically a crime, but could get you fired or black listed in an entire industry or academia.
His works are public domain in his home country, which would be the basis for WTC enforcement. However there was a scam run years ago by european publishers. They would claim that works by for example J. S. Bach were held in secret, never published by the Bach estate, then they would have an editor, either Mary Widor or Albert Schweitzer, make an edition, and this would get a brand new copyright in the USA because prior to 1984, we were on a publication basis. it didn't matter that the original author was dead 500 years. this particular loophole has been closed for new editions as unpublished works fall into public domain in the USA 75 years after the death of the author.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: