True are false?
under the parol evidence rule, virtually any evidence is admissible to prove or disprove the terms of a contract.
Answers:
Yes, any evidence can be used UNLESS it is illegaly obtained evidence (ex. found without warrant) or if it is considered "fruit of the poisonous tree" which is evidence that was found due to illegaly obtained evidence. However, if the police can prove that they would have found this evidence anyway, the evidence would then be admissable.
no
Er...True. LOL.
Green, I pick green
... a contract is a contract. the terms are included in said contract, i don't see a situation in which you would ever need to prove the terms. maybe that the terms were violated but not the terms.
by the by it's true OR false, not are.
no
No.
Under the parol evidence rule, extrinsic evidence cannot be used to vary the terms of a fully integrated written contract.
First, there needs to be a written contract. Then it needs to be the final representation of what the parties intended, as oppose to a draft. That's a fully integrated contract.
Now the rule kicks in, and will prevent any evidence outside of the writing of the contract (extrinsic evidence), to vary it's terms.
This comes up when there is a written contract and one party wants to change a term, such as price, by saying they agreed to a different price. They can't since the contract itself is considered the best evidence of the contract.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: