"Jury members" wanted in 48 hours time..Will that be you?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
I am much encouraged by the range of answers in my 2 questions above, although, Nothing short of a radical overhaul of the legal system could make me have ANY faith in it again.
However, I am mindful that perhaps the FAIR way to choose a best answer here is to leave it to the Community to make THE decision here - YOU can be my jury.
Read answers carefully, digest their words and cogitate over them and reach the appropriate verdict here.
My jury is open to ALL.. irrespective of race, religion or gender.
ALL I ask is you read each answer carefully, think about the answer BEFORE making your decision.
SIMPLE AS ..
Answers:
ok
If a learned judge saw fit to refer the matter, after initially being reluctant to do so, one would think that the matter would be pursued to a conclusion. Perhaps the truth is that the government feared the accused juror could not receive a fair trial.
I do not think the justice system needs an overhaul. The politicans just need to write the laws and then let the legal eagles and beaks get on with it. In other words, the pols can keep their nebs out of something that doesn't concern them. Every day, up and down the country, justice is dispensed fairly and wisely without political interference. What does that tell you?
Frankly, I'm glad I'm the other side of the Pond these days.
The jurors are selected from the voters list and ensures as much as is practical the best option
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers:
Have Hawaii's Bill of Rights ever been violated?-more than 10 times?
The people at the tax office told me to fill out a small buisness form but I am well endowed. Isn't that lying
How many criminals consider consequences before committing a crime?
If someone loses their job and can't pay their mortgage?
When does an opinion become slander?
What do you think about.?
How do I resign in this situation?
I think gay people should not be allowed to marry in the church but I think they should be allowed a civil.
Where in the United states is it legal just to grow marijuana?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
I am much encouraged by the range of answers in my 2 questions above, although, Nothing short of a radical overhaul of the legal system could make me have ANY faith in it again.
However, I am mindful that perhaps the FAIR way to choose a best answer here is to leave it to the Community to make THE decision here - YOU can be my jury.
Read answers carefully, digest their words and cogitate over them and reach the appropriate verdict here.
My jury is open to ALL.. irrespective of race, religion or gender.
ALL I ask is you read each answer carefully, think about the answer BEFORE making your decision.
SIMPLE AS ..
Answers:
ok
If a learned judge saw fit to refer the matter, after initially being reluctant to do so, one would think that the matter would be pursued to a conclusion. Perhaps the truth is that the government feared the accused juror could not receive a fair trial.
I do not think the justice system needs an overhaul. The politicans just need to write the laws and then let the legal eagles and beaks get on with it. In other words, the pols can keep their nebs out of something that doesn't concern them. Every day, up and down the country, justice is dispensed fairly and wisely without political interference. What does that tell you?
Frankly, I'm glad I'm the other side of the Pond these days.
The jurors are selected from the voters list and ensures as much as is practical the best option
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question:
More Law Questions and Answers: